The provided charts illustrate the quantity of speed cameras installed in Melbourne and the proportion of accidents and fatality occurred from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, there was an upward trend in all categories over the examined years. Additionally, the rate of road accidents taking place in Melbourne was always higher than that of mortality.
Turning to the details, in 2002, the number of speed cameras equipped in Melbourne’s road was about 30 cameras. Subsequently, the figure went up gradually to 70 cameras in the next 2 years, and after that it underwent a significant growth to approximately 145 cameras in 2005.
Regarding the remaining categories, both the proportions of accidents and mortality in Melbourne’s streets experienced an erratic fluctuation from 2002 to 2004. From 2004 onwards, there was a slight increase to just under 4% in the percentage of road accidents in Melbourne. By contrast, the figure for death rate climbed to hit the peak of 1.8% in the period between 2004 and 2005, prior to a minimal decline to around 1.2% at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fatality occurred from 2002 to 2005. Overall, there was an upward trend in al...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...always higher than that of mortality. Turning to the details, in 2002, the num...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to approximately 145 cameras in 2005. Regarding the remaining categories, both...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...around 1.2% at the end of the period.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14606741573 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97143748499 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8899680754 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214069171694 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929286044553 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064245482822 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134153473379 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468994730077 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.