The charts show information concerning speed camera use together with statistics on road accidents for the city of Melbourne

Essay topics:

The charts show information concerning speed-camera use, together with statistics on road accidents, for the city of Melbourne.

The chart illustrates the count of speed-cameras and the ratio of accidents and deaths in Melbourne's street from 2002 to 2005.

Overall, The use of the cameras in a road are in increasing order, along with the survival of people are raising at the end but no impact for accidents level.

In the year 2002, There were nearly 40 cameras installed on the roads, and the survival ratio is beneath 1% also the accident level is about 3%. Next year the capturing devices count raised by 5, but the proportion of the deaths are likely to be idle, whereas the accidental level is fluctuating till the end of a year.

Till the half of 2004 the accident proportion and death proportions are declining, but in the second half, it level-up slightly then initial value. The installations of the cameras are rosed up by 30% than in the year 2003. Lately, in the year 2005, the roads are more secure than earlier after the installation of nearly 140 cameras. In case of death, it moved up quickly and pursued about 1.5% of death percentage, for the accident, the number is steadily rising up by 3.2% till the end of the year 2005.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (16 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, then, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60696517413 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53136557767 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2227381086 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111278559769 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565200419018 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591031047489 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918610877436 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638348687459 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.