The line graph shows the percentage of road disasters and the number of deaths that occured in a time period of 4 years(2002 to 2005) in Melbourne. Also, a bar graph indicates the quantity of speed sensors used in the city in the same time period.
Overall, the number of speed cameras used has seen an consistent increase from 2002 to 2005. Moreover, the percentage of deaths and accidents have been irregular in the given years.
Firstly, the road accident cases are just over 3% in the year 2002, which has increased to around 3.5% in the year 2004 and has reached its highest point of 4% in last mentioned year. Furthermore, the death cases start at less than 1% in 2002 and has reached a point of 1% in the year 2004. The cases have seen a drastic increase in the middle of 2004 (close to 2%) and finaly stands just above 1% in 2005.
The number of speed cameras used started below 50 in 2002 and increased slight in the year 2003. It crossed the 50 mark in the year 2004 and almost touched 150 in the year 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e number of speed cameras used has seen an consistent increase from 2002 to 2005. ...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2002 and has reached a point of 1% in the year 2004. The cases have seen a dra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35602094241 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22265954537 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507853403141 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8728975393 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132944808412 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618572751263 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525446371521 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920474482655 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415053492035 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.