In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
Some people believe that the widespread of online reading materials will make people reject to use pressed documentaries such as newspapers and books. However, I believe that we should take advantages of both kinds of reading method.
On the one hand, the popularity of ebooks can do wonders for human being in many different ways. First of all, people can easily access to the big data that stores numerous scanned books without paying any expenses. This helps us to save a large amount of money instead of going to the brick-and-mortar stores to search for any particular books. For example, in todays knowledge-based society, PDF or Word materials have been shared widely via the Internet that allows everyone to read and download to their personal computer. Moreover, online reading exerts positive effects on our environments. By reducing the usage of paper, our forests have been protected from deforestation. This is why some people prefer to use online reading books.
On the other hand, printed documentaries still play a vital role on our education and laws. First, reading printed materials have a direct relationship with the knowledge gained by students. Some researches show that student tend to remember the lessons longer by reading printed books in comparison to ebooks. In addition, the governments in many countries adopts the policy of intellectual property on publishing industry. It means that there are materials that are unavailable in the Internet to protect the authors right.
In conclusion, there are convincing reasons why people prefer ebooks rather than printed ones. It seems to me that we should use all of them to maximize our reading experiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...books can do wonders for human being in many different ways. First of all, people can easily a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22509225092 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83275170769 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60147601476 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.646814226 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151118868984 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458018916483 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361362290211 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845561438967 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269474348565 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.