The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years.
The pie chart below compares the data about the Anthropology student from one university did after graduating from the program. While the table presents the salaries of the anthropologist after 5 years of working. In general, full-time work accounted for the largest proportion in the destination of anthropology graduates. In addition, the majority of government employers were making the highest salary within a given period.
It could be easily observed from the pie chart that graduates were employed full-time held the lion's share, with 52 percent. 15 percent of total graduates were appointed in a part-time job, taking the second position. Unemployment, graduate study, or unknown, and part-time together with graduate study ranged from 8 to 15 percent.
In comparison with the figures of the anthropology of student's initial occupations after graduation, those of the anthropologists' salaries after 5 years experiences were completely different. Government workers led the distribution, as 50% made up more than $100,000 as opposed to 40% and 30% freelancers and private workers, respectively. A similar trend can be seen in freelance and freelance consultants, with 5 and 15 percent in the slab below $75,000. Private companies represented 10 percent in the lowest income range, a striking 35 percent earning $50,000 to $74,999, while 25 percent and 30 percent of graduates made $75,000- $99,999 and $100,000+, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below compares the data about the Anthr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... study ranged from 8 to 15 percent. In comparison with the figures of the anthropology of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46363636364 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12784085748 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604545454545 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4353837647 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.272727273 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235790256782 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104107493185 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111963816575 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181530818068 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130380704806 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.