The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table below compares the data about the amount of money spent on Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in two different years in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden. In general, sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas accounted for the largest proportion and significantly increased in the United Kingdom and Switzerland in this period.
It could be easily observed from the table that the UK is the country that witnessed went up dramatically in the sales of coffee, from 1.5 to 20 millions of Euros in 2004. Similarly, sales figures of Fairtrade- labelled coffee in Switzerland remarkably increased to 6 million in 2004, taking the second position. In three countries, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden, coffee sales varied from 0.8 to 2 million in Euros in the same period.
In comparison with the data of coffee, those of bananas appeared different in these countries. Switzerland consumed the highest portion of bananas, increasing from 15 to nearly 50 million of Euros. The next position is for the UK, with 5.5 million in 2004. Except for the rise in Belgium, to 4 million, there was a considerable drop in sales of these products, reaching from 0.9 to 1 million in Sweden and Denmark.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...lly in the sales of coffee, from 1.5 to 20 millions of Euros in 2004. Similarly, sales figures...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...illion in Euros in the same period. In comparison with the data of coffee, those of banan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, so, except for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05319095374 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6584691191 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.888888889 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179103967204 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824869159091 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576698420062 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13575979944 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646079084326 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.