The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
The maps below illustrate the information about how different the public park established in 1920 and that of today. In general, there are several improvements in the Grange park after the development.
It could be easily observed from the first map that, fountain is located in the center of the map, with the large stage for musicians on the left, between the entrance at the top and bottom. The rose garden, seats were built surrounding the park. The northeastern corner used to space for a pond for water plants while the southeastern one was for a glasshouse.
In comparison with the grange park in 1920, in the development, the park is upgraded. First of all, the most striking change is in the center of the park, where the fountain has been removed in favor of a rose garden with full seating around it. To the left of the new garden, previous stage for musicians has been turned into a much larger amphitheater for concerts. This change has necessitated the removal of both seating on the far left side as well as the rose garden in the bottom left corner of the map. The entrances at the top and bottom remain the same, whereas the rose garden and pond for water plant on the right site were replaced by café and children’s play area. Finally, a water feature has been built occupying the bottom right corner (replacing a glasshouse and some seats), leading to the water park is a new entrance for an underground car park.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...theastern one was for a glasshouse. In comparison with the grange park in 1920, in the de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...al of both seating on the far left side as well as the rose garden in the bottom left corn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, well, whereas, while, as for, in general, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63921568627 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54245308045 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525490196078 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1055344706 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.545454545 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204770437685 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992057738133 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102012540381 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17303449559 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103515729262 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...theastern one was for a glasshouse. In comparison with the grange park in 1920, in the de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...al of both seating on the far left side as well as the rose garden in the bottom left corn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, well, whereas, while, as for, in general, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63921568627 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54245308045 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525490196078 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1055344706 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.545454545 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204770437685 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992057738133 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102012540381 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17303449559 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103515729262 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.