The chart gives information about the number of subscribers using the phone per 100 residents in Africa between 1994 and 2004.
The line chart illustrates how many residents registered to use mobile and fixed-line phones in Africa from 1994 to 2004.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the percentages of subscribers for both mobile and fixed-line phones increased over the period. However, while landlines were the most popular choice at the beginning of the period, cellular phones were significantly more common by the ending of the period.
In 1994, 1.7% of African inhabitants subscribed to fixed-line phones, with only 0.06% of people using mobile phones. Over the four years ensuing, the number of users in both categories experienced a trivial increase. While the proportion of citizens using landlines continued to rise gradually to approximately 3% in 2001, the figure for cellular phones soared and caught up with the rate of fixed-line phones in 2001.
From 2001 onwards, the percentage of mobile phones subscribers still strongly rose and reached a peak of 8.8% in 2004, compared to 3.1% for fixed-line phones supporters in the same year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25748502994 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83350610685 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604790419162 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9973759949 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210340931866 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103760878177 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759796571485 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147780143698 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775843645773 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.