The chart gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2021 and future projections for 2025.
The bar chart compares 3 main exports of Southland for the years 2000, 2021, and expectations for 2025.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that exports of international tourism and oil products considerably rose. However, there was a slightly decrease on meat products in the last 2 decades.
Southland saw the most benefit, 8 billion £, from international tourism in 2000. At that time, exports of dairy and meat products did just under 7 billion £ and 6 billion £ profit respectively. In 2021, exports of dairy products peaked to the top, the figures for 10 billion £, while tourism was about 9 billion £ and meat was 5,5 billion £.
It is estimated that international tourism will grow significantly to just over 10 billion £ for the foreseeable future in 2025. Such dramatic differences are not seen when we compare the figures for international tourism and dairy products. Dairy products' export will fall slightly to 9,5 billion £. The opposite trend can be seen when we look export of meat products which will decrease to 5 billion £.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...s considerably rose. However, there was a slightly decrease on meat products in the last 2 decades....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86111111111 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80244051489 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8211603274 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235718687739 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110780471768 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132386547919 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197055539965 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170361776674 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.