Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam.
How true do you think this statement is?
What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
Car posession has been rising over the last 3 decades that in many urban areas of the world are becoming traffic jams now. I would argue that traffic jams are one of the most issues for people and society.
On the one hand, there are numerous disadvantages of cars which governments should pay attention. Due to the big traffic jams, workers and citizens suffer from delaying to their work. Moreover, delaying of government employees plays an important role in the public. From my own experience, a few months ago, I went to the bank office for opening a new plastic card, but staff of the bank had not come. Thereafter, I called him and said that he had faced to traffic jam. Consequently, I had to wait him and delay my other works.
Governments can reduce cars by interacting factors and car producers which are manufacturing millions of cars in a day. Secondly, decreasing number of vehicles is taking higher tax on automobiles. Thirdly, declining cars is prohibition of car movement on a special day in a week. I believe that the last way is such a beneficial affect not only for traffic jams, but also for eco systems.
On the other hand, a graet deal of people may resist some of my ideas which I have suggested above. For example, everyone wants to own their cars and drive everywhere they want. Moreover, they do not like to pay higher bills for cars.
In conclusion, I consider that governments should work on public transport system in order not to face traffic jam.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...new plastic card, but staff of the bank hadnt come. Thereafter, I called him and said...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e everywhere they want. Moreover, they dont like to pay higher bills for cars. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71538461538 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65072279972 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7675070001 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.625 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245431920082 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750685070303 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626014888767 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132002381497 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641131034944 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.