The chart illustrates the percentage of male and female executives in six different types of profession across the UK in 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where necessary.
The chart shows the measurement of executives differentiate by gender in various profession across the UK in the year 2007. Overall, female only ranked first in three kinds of profession, whereas, male ranked first in the remaining profession.
In 2007, female executive had around 55% in advertising, while male had a narrow margin to female with over 40%. However, teaching and construction had opposite percentage unexpectedly. In teaching, there was a high contribution of female with exactly 90%, while male had a difference of 80% and vice versa in construction. It was a constrast proportion between both gender. Moreover, therapists had similar proportion as teaching of over 80% belonged to female and male only contributed with less than 20%.
Both gender had similar percentage for journalism. In the other hand, male ranked first in scientists and law, which previously also occured to construction. The former profession had a difference of 20% in both gender. The latter had over 50% of male executive and the measurement of female had narrow margin to male with approximately 40%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29714285714 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0789025344 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8843467904 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2727272727 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182899184465 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784478171342 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591855907576 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139007425344 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255929361501 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.