The assigned bar chart compares the amount of expenditure on six consumer goods(Personal stereos, Tennis racquets, Perfumes, CDs, Toys, Photographic film) in Germany, Italy, France and Britain.
It is clear that Britain continuously stood at the highest in six different goods. On the converse, Germany's expenditure on six goods nearly was the lowest. In the meantime, Italy and France saw similar spending on some goods.
In terms of Photographic film, Toys and CDs. Britain accounts for the majority of spending on these goods, all were over 160 thousand pounds sterling, which expenses for Photographic film were a little bit more than France with a figure of 165 approximately. Subsequently, Italy saw similar expenses between Photographic film and Toys with a figure of 155 approximately, as same as the expenses of toys in Italy. At last, Germany stood at the minority expenses in four countries, which were less than 150 thousand pounds sterling.
Moving to the remaining terms Perfumes, Tennis racquets and Personal stereos. Britain has preferred Perfumes over the other two goods, with a figure of 160 thousand pounds sterling. Germany's expenses for these foods nearly were the same with a figure of around 150, which is moderately lower than expenses in Italy, and slightly higher than expenses in France.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...h expenses for Photographic film were a little bit more than France with a figure of 165 a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81713657876 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9323785612 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0771977854458 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385708173402 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572952033925 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692184323509 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662527294474 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.