The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now

Given are two maps illustrating the changes that took place on the village park between 10 years ago and now.

From an overall perspective, the park has witnessed a significant improvement, and it is expected to serve better purpose of relaxing people here. It is noticeable that a cycle path is built surround the park would provide more convenience.

In the centre of park, the football pitch is remained while the woods on the southeast corner of the park is replaced by the cafeteria, which is closed to toilets. In the southwestern part of the park, with the disappreance of the pond and introduction of two new facilities, including boating lake and picnic area. On the opposite site, Childern's play area was divided into two separate parts,childern's park and children's softplay area, which is next to extended tennis court, enlarging double space than before. Ordinarilly, the car park on the west of park have changed, it could maintain 50 cars now while merely serve 20 cars in the past time. Additionally, a new entrance is built on the east of park, next to children's softplay area, while the old entrance is still kelp on the northwest of the park.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , childerns
...area was divided into two separate parts,childerns park and childrens softplay area, which...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...s now while merely serve 20 cars in the past time. Additionally, a new entrance is built ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86432160804 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81493167005 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608040201005 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3003197178 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2151769521 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970612621758 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962781691937 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177278316276 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120524671332 0.0819641961636 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.