The assigned tabular chart compares the proportion of number of mobile holders and PC owners in 2003 among six different conturies, namey, Luxemburg,Italy,Singapore,Germany,South Korea and China.
From an overall perspective, Luxemburg was superior when compared with the other countries both on mobile holders and PC owners. While the other countries accounted for moderately lower proportion in that. and China saw a sharp slump both on mobile holders and PC owners.
In 2003, Luxemburg hosted the highest rank in number of mobile holders among six countries with a figure of 872 per thousand people. Followed by Italy and Singapore, with the figures of 737 and 684, respectively. Following that, Germany and South Korea accounted for minority of mobile holders, with the range between 350 and 600. Whatelse, china is nearly less than 10 times as South Korea.
In terms of PC owners, Luxemburg and Singapore accounted for majority among six countries in that. Subsequnently, Italy,Germany and South Korea remained at the same level, all were nearly 450. In the meantime, China stood at the last proportion of PC owners, with a figure of merely 88.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Italy
...ix different conturies, namey, Luxemburg,Italy,Singapore,Germany,South Korea and China...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Germany
...turies, namey, Luxemburg,Italy,Singapore,Germany,South Korea and China. From an overa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...or moderately lower proportion in that. and China saw a sharp slump both on mobile ...
^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Germany
... countries in that. Subsequnently, Italy,Germany and South Korea remained at the same le...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29891304348 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.64076488541 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559782608696 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8636083399 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6363636364 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.18181818182 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0671746307968 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273741648623 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391121814167 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0494506369595 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367928637697 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.