The assigned pie charts show average proportions of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar in four typical meals that people consume in one day in the USA.
From an overall perspective, people consume too much nutrients at dinner, and sodium is the main reason should be blamed for that. Besides that, most added sugar that people consume from snacks.
It is clear that people in the USA consume familiar amounts of three nutrients at breakfast, all are around 16%. However, percentages of them vary a lot at snacks, while added sugar accounted for the majority proportion of snacks with a figure of 42%, sodium merely stands for 14%, which is 2 per cent lower when compared with saturated.
Moving to the two remaining items, nutrients that people consume at dinner are 3% higher than advising. sodium and saturated fat were main reasons that should be blamed for threatening people's health, to be more species, 43% in sodium and 37% in saturated fat. And added sugar account for 23% of that. After that, people consume at lunch saw familiar percentages in sodium and saturated fat, 29% and 26% respectively. Additionally, added sugar stood for 19% made it inferior.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...overall perspective, people consume too much nutrients at dinner, and sodium is the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sodium
... at dinner are 3% higher than advising. sodium and saturated fat were main reasons tha...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... respectively. Additionally, added sugar stood for 19% made it inferior.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96954314721 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50720315585 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593908629442 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.9966345065 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133350903362 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054674421703 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533231805586 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968547687456 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390114422915 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.