The chart shows the average life expectancy for males and females in 1900 1950 and 1990

The bar graph illustrates the average live expectancy in five different regions around the global compared to the world average. Overall, it can be seen clearly that females had higher average live expectancy than males in every regions excepts, in Africa. Moreover, Europain and North American people had greater average life expectancy than the world average but the average of the other regions were lower.

Looking first at the male data, the world average life expectancy (68 years) was higher than the average in Asia, South America and Africa by 6, 8 and 7 years respectively. On the other hand, the Europian people had more average life expectancy than the world by over 10 years. Finally, the average life expectancy in North America was noted at 70 year, leaving the world average behind by 6 years.

Turning to the female data, the global average life expectancy was recorded at 68 years being lower than the average Europe and North America by 14 and 5 years respectively. In contrast, the range of the average life expectancy for Asian, South American and African people was between 62 to 53 years which was lower than the world average around 15 to 6 years.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the world average behind by 6 years. Turning to the female data, the global a...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, moreover, so, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41545026858 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5181758116 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277659776797 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160884021624 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306766670399 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220457940701 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0056150181465 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.