The bar graph illustrates the average live expectancy in five different regions around the global compared to the world average. Overall, it can be seen clearly that females had a higher average life expectancy than males in every region excepts, in Africa. Moreover, European and North American people have a greater average life expectancy than the world average, but averages of the other regions were lower.
Looking first at the male data, the world average life expectancy (68 years) was more than the average in Asia, South America and Africa by 6, 8 and 7 years respectively. On the other hand, the European people had a higher average lifespan than the world by over 10 years. Finally, the average in North America was noted at 70 years, leaving the world average behind by 6 years.
Turning to the female data, the global average life expectancy was recorded at 68 years being lower than the averages of Europe and North America by 14 and 5 years respectively. In contrast, the range of the average life expectancy of the Asian, South American and African people was between 62 to 53 years, which was below the world average around 15 to 6 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the world average behind by 6 years. Turning to the female data, the global a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, moreover, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.825 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43921606259 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2135627658 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24372403736 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135607721359 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578232226509 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195904725685 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330060128611 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.