The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

The bar chart delineates the proportion of GDP from IT and Service industry in UK between 1992 to 2000
Overall, both IT and Service industry showed an upward trend throughout the period. IT industrial share kept ahead and grown swiftly with each passing stage. Furthermore, the occupation of Service went up sequentially in the same era. The gap between the two became great disparity in the end.
Percentage of GDP in IT industry was 6% in 1992, being higher than Service industry rate by approximately 2%. Two years later, it increased to 8%. Nevertheless, the figure illustrated almost remain steady in 1996 and then the rate of IT industry began to grow significantly which is 12% in 1998 and almost 15% in 2000.
Service industry rate was about 4% in 1992, and it uplifted to 6% in 1994, then in 1996 it had a gentle jump to around 7% and being ceaseless in next two years. Service industry was widened the gap of ratio to the IT industry in this corresponding period.in 2000, it rose to approximately 8% and being almost half of “IT” ratio.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ndustry was widened the gap of ratio to the IT industry in this corresponding period.i...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75675675676 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83477311991 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.756024529 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0834493464903 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330831382554 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514578784567 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804097661993 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846921616268 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.