The bar chart gives information about the American people's frequency of eating in fast-food restaurants over a 10-year period.
Overall, most of the population fell into two categories of fast-food consuming frequency, which were once a week and once or twice a month. By contrast, fewest people ate in fast-food restaurants every day between 2003 and 2013.
As the graph shows, more than 30% of the USA population ate fast food in restaurants once a week in 2003, while the figure for people who ate once or twice a month is relatively close, standing at 30%. The figure for the former group witnessed a decline to about 27% in 2013, while the percentage of the latter group saw an increase to around 33%, surpassing the former group. Fewer people ate in fast-food restaurants several times a week. The figure for this group was approximately 16% in 2003 and rose to exactly 20% in 2006, before dropping to just above 15% in 2013. Similarly, people who ate in fast-food restaurants a few times a year accounted for about 13% of the population. This figure increased to exactly 15% in 2006 and remained constant in 2013.
On the other hand, people who ate in fast-food restaurants every day and those who never did accounted for about 4% and 5% of the population, being the smallest sectors. The figures for both groups saw a decrease in 2006 to 3% and 4% respectively, then remained stable in 2013.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the fewest'.
Suggestion: , the fewest
...k and once or twice a month. By contrast, fewest people ate in fast-food restaurants eve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'account'
Suggestion: account
...rants every day and those who never did accounted for about 4% and 5% of the population, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77459016393 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69684276472 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52868852459 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0874898014 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.909090909 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377234118865 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171210841807 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132302565098 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242383203125 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578015328324 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.