The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The given graph gives information about the percentage of people in US who used to eat a fast food meals between 2003 and 2013.
Overall, the number of persons who eat fast food every day noticed a decline along the given period. While the number of people who eat a once or twice in the month has fluctuation in the proportion.
For people who eat every day, the percentage was about 4% in 2003. Then declined slightly to around 3%. The rate stand on the same level in 2013.
Turning to people who ea several times a week, the percentages was about 18% in 2003, which was four times of the people who eat every day. While the rate decreased by 2% in 2013.
Moving onto persons who eat once a week, the rate reached to a peak around 33% in 2006 the decreased to 27% in 2013.
For people who eat a once or twice a month, the rate was approximately 33% in 2013, which was the same proportion for people who eat once a week in 2006.
Finally, the people who do not eat fast food, the rate was about 5% in 2003, which is more slightly the people who eat every day. Then declined to around 4% in 2006 and 2013.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'stands'.
Suggestion: stands
...eclined slightly to around 3%. The rate stand on the same level in 2013. Turning to ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... times of the people who eat every day. While the rate decreased by 2% in 2013. Movi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.20560747664 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15280125327 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415887850467 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5378007228 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175100205852 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878687741935 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628409340524 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121718415267 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685882036873 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 13.2329268293 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.84 11.4140731707 60% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.18 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.