The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the uk, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The given bar graph gives information about how many minutes in billion made by British people, these calls have three types: local, national and international, and cellular between 1995 and 2002.
In general, although the popularity of mobile calls increased steadily during the given period, the most popular type was local call and it had the highest number of minutes.
Initially, it can be seen that the number of minutes for local calls was doubled the national and international fixed-line calls, it was just 74 billion minutes in 1995. After that This number reached a peak at about 90 billion minutes in 1999 before significantly falling down to the same number of 1995(74 billion minutes). Furthermore, the national and international calls, cellular calls as well have the same trend. However, they were still less than local calls. In 1995 the number of national and international calls was 38 billion minutes then went up by around 22 billion minutes in 2002 which is not as many as mobile calls, it is approximately 45 billion minutes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...s information about how many minutes in billion made by British people, these calls hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...it was just 74 billion minutes in 1995. After that This number reached a peak at abou...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is approximately 45 billion minutes.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, still, then, well, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04022988506 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66414491347 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1996624203 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257422547572 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122149297492 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790213384624 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163089496554 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062824106763 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.