the charts below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the uk, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Information on how many minutes were spoken on phone over an eight-year period is provided in the bar chart.
As regards local calls from fixed lines, figures rose and fell evenly over the period. Levels increased until 1999, reaching a high of about 90 billion minutes. In the following years, figures declined slowly to just above 70 billion minutes in 2002.
Regarding national and international calls from fixed lines and all mobile calls, figures grew throughout the period. The former, which was nearly 40 billions in 1995, experienced a steady increase, with 60 billion minutes being spoken in 2002. The latter was approximately 2 billions in 1995 and remained under 10 billion until 1998. In the year 1999, it was around 12 billions and went up considerably until 2002, when just under 50 billion minutes were spoken.
To sum up, the bar chart reveals that as the use of mobiles became widespread during the period, people tended to make calls through mobiles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, as regards, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09259259259 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47428475484 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672839506173 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8581284143 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189140679473 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796402425897 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265557731601 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105548804519 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320676572106 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.