The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015

The given bar graph gives information about exporting five types of products between 2015 and 2016. While the table illustrates the proportion of change in values for every type of exports compared to 2015.
In general, the initial impression from graph is the export earnings for petroleum products increased comparing with 2015. In contrast, the export earnings for gems and jewellery declined if compared with 2015. In addition, the change rate in values went up except for gems and jewellery between two given years.
The value for petroleum products was a little above 60 million dollars then grew up slightly to around 65 $ million. For engineered goods, the value increased by 5 million dollars between 2015 and 2016. While the pattern changed for gems and jewellery, it went down to 40 million from 44 million between 2015 and 2016. Turning to table, it can be seen that the change per cent went up 3%. Whilst the gems and jewellery decreased by 5.18%. the highest changing rate happened in textiles products, it increased by 15.24%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...wellery declined if compared with 2015. In addition, the change rate in values wen...
^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$65'.
Suggestion: $65
...dollars then grew up slightly to around 65 $ million. For engineered goods, the valu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...rs then grew up slightly to around 65 $ million. For engineered goods, the value increa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... gems and jewellery decreased by 5.18%. the highest changing rate happened in texti...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, well, while, except for, in addition, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00574712644 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47204781672 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557471264368 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.107360355 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.1818181818 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238926117449 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107831559528 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821879219248 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196300548063 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066081152567 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.