The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The given graph illustrates the main causes of the less productive agriculture land. While, the table explains how land becomes less productivity for three regions including North American, Europe, and Oceania during the 1990s.
It is evident that the main reason causes the land degradation is an over-grazing in the world. While the highest reason in Europe causes the land degradation is deforestation.
When it comes to pie graph, it describes the four reasons for land declination. Initially, the highest reason for the land’s Devolution is deforestation with 28%. Then the second highest reason is an over-grazing with its proportion exactly thirty percent. In addition, the second smallest reason for declined land is an over-cultivation (28%). Moreover, 7% of the degraded land is affected by other unknown reasons.
The given table gives information about land degradation in three different regions. Furthermore, the region has the highest land degradation in Europe countries with 23 as a total percentage. However, the lowest degraded land is 5% in North America.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dation is an over-grazing in the world. While the highest reason in Europe causes the...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gion has the highest land degradation in Europe countries with 23 as a total perc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49101796407 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08289620115 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.042143099 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4166666667 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9166666667 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2900564119 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116710030957 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729066267596 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193842472641 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905515627524 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.97 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.