The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The given bar chart gives information about international sales for the top five cellular phones companies during the years 2009 and 2013. The units sold measured in million.
In general, it can be seen that Samsung and Nokia companies achieved the highest sales compared with other brands in 2009. However, the Apple brand was the lowest sales in 2009 then increased in the next years but still lower than Samsung and Nokia.
Beginning with 2009, it can be observed that the units sold for Samsung were more than 200 million. However, the Apple sold around 30 million. The sales for Nokia were close to the Samsung selling, which were approximately 440 million. Whereas the sales for LG and ZTE were 120 and 40 million respectively.
Moving to 2011, it can be witnessed that the sales of Samsung, Apple and ZTE increased to around 340, 90, and 50 respectively. Whereas the sales of Nokia and LG declined slightly to 420 and 80 million respectively.
Finally, in 2013 the sales of Samsung peaked at around 450 million. While LG company decreased slowly by 10 million compared with 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...09 and 2013. The units sold measured in million. In general, it can be seen that Samsu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...f Samsung peaked at around 450 million. While LG company decreased slowly by 10 milli...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, so, still, then, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87634408602 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48992071525 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6525267016 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5833333333 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177243066356 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708431447521 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807041481736 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117592012033 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830193700676 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.