Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
There is no doubt that these days the sharing information in many sectors is very popular. However, the question: does information transmission acceptable in the word? Is considered the one of the most controversial issues today. In this essay, I am going to examine this phenomenon from both viewpoints.
On one the arguments, there are people who argue the benefits considerably outweigh the disadvantages this is having knowledge for all. Then if he or she has information about the business, scientific domain, or any other sectors, he or she would spread the knowledge around the world to increase the development. For example, the spreading information from developed countries through internet toward other parts of the world, it contributes the benefits to all humans. As consequence, it is very important to circulate the information to all nations in the earth.
On the other hand, it is also quite possible to consider it with the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact, the spreading information violate the copyright for inventors and authors. Moreover, the broadcast information will result in the plagiarism problems. One good illustration here is the researchers who copy the PHD or Master their thesis from the internet and present these thesis to their universities by their names. As result, the information broadcast causes some problems.
To sum up, the essay tries to give answers to the question in the introduction. I strongly believe the spreading information is more beneficial than banned it. Therefore, the spreading information encourages other nations to be more a creative and looking forward to the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ght for inventors and authors. Moreover, the broadcast information will result in...
^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this thesis' or 'these theses'?
Suggestion: this thesis; these theses
...ir thesis from the internet and present these thesis to their universities by their names. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: MORE_A_JJ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a more creative'?
Suggestion: a more creative
...ormation encourages other nations to be more a creative and looking forward to the future.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, in fact, no doubt, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28136882129 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05054832842 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577946768061 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5602563414 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8125 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243006855512 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713049875383 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486518235754 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127002264977 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191137621349 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.