It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
No doubt nowadays that the getting talented people are considered one of the most controversial issues. Some people argue that the talent is born with the person. While other people believe the talent is earned with some training and exercises. I personally believe the person earns the talent by learning from the surrounded environment.
On one of the arguments, there are people who argue that the talented people were born with talent itself. So they can do exceptional tasks better than non-talented persons. On good illustration here is, the children of teachers become teachers, moreover, the traders are inherited their trade to their children and so on. As consequence, the talent is birth with humans.
On the other hand, other people are argued that the persons are birthed with equal talents and the learning and training develop their skills. So the skills are grown up through studying and hard works. For instance, people often have this opinion because they see most people work hard to achieve advancement in their career path or to reach their targets. Therefore, if he or she wants to meet their goals, he or she would have a being well-motivated.
In addition, there are environmental factors affecting on people who earn advanced skills such as persons who live near the seas, they can swim better than ones live a far-off ocean.
To sum up, every person has special skills such as a speech, sport, or art. Some people think the talented persons have the skill since their birth. Whereas, others believe that the human can earn the talent only through training and learning. As result, This essay stands on the second position through presenting explanation and examples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... she would have a being well-motivated. In addition, there are environmental fac...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h presenting explanation and examples.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, no doubt, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06049822064 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52458937257 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551601423488 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.708616037 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6470588235 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186237148931 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704681080202 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535956250009 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106914036974 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397901513389 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.