It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
It is sometimes argued that talents relating to play sport or musician instruments are inherited from the ancestors. Despite this epitome of creation, I concur to the view that becoming a good sports or musician is purely possible by being taught.
On the one hand, those coming into special talents never find it difficult to acquire knowledge from their lectures. As a result, they do not have to spend a lot of time catching up their peers as well as possessing the more greatly professional skills. Moreover, taking a welcome break from everyone around them can help gifted children gain more attraction of those who are willing to pour money into giving their children the best studying environment. For instance, being recognized and exposed to those who were able to help child cultivate their talent early gives such children more opportunity to be the old hand in the future because they had a deep insight and a well-prepared platform.
On the other hand, I agree to those who argued that being good at sport or music is not influenced by inherited talents. First, having the passion on playing sports and instruments is an advantaged factor which helps them devote their whole time to get their head buried in studying or practicing. A perfectly appropriated training process pulls them closer to remarkable progress. Secondly, modern teaching system let them put their knowledge gained into practice easily as well as brush up on it. They totally have the capacity of studying more effectively in a short time.
Although many opinions shown that a successful sport or music career depends on inherited talents but I am not agree with this view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...pends on inherited talents but I am not agree with this view.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9928057554 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63710038333 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607913669065 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2305820829 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161943822233 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647581871275 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767420456382 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1212128436 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069977662108 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.