The bar chart compares the percentage of the habit of eating fast food of Americans in three separate years (2003, 2006 and 2013).
It is clear that most Americans went to fast food restaurants once a week in 2006 and once or twice a month in 2006 and once or twice a month in 2013. It is also noticeable that the figure for people who ate fast food every day was lowest for all three years.
In 2006, more than one third Americans went to fast food restaurants, but it decreased to about 27% in 2013. The proportion for people ate fast food once or twice a month decreased by 5% from 2003 to 2006 then rose to 33% in 2013.
From 2003 to 2013, the figure for the number of people who had fast food as a meal several times a week ranging from 16% to 20%. Additionally, people who ate a few times a year had the same percentage at 15% in 2006 and 2013 while it is 12,5% in 2003. Finally, daily eaters and those who had never eaten fast food accounted for a very small proportion with about 5%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.15544041451 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18507920438 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492227979275 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 12.8056384066 43.030603864 30% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.25 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313088946077 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159655047286 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549309859645 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215978941235 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222422675969 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.14 11.4140731707 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.14 8.06136585366 76% => OK
difficult_words: 16.0 40.7170731707 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.