Some people argue that the money of governments should be used for the development of railways more than the upgrade of roads. While I agree the importance of railways but I believe that roads should be spent rather than train travel.
On the one hand, train is one of the most popular vehicles and easy to approach thanks to its convenient. In my country, Viet Nam, there are a lot of railways throughout the land which make people can go among cities with just some hours. Through the improvement of railways, travelling time could be significant decrease from hours to minutes so that traveler could have more time for works. Train also allow for most people’s finance even if with a student or unemployed person. For example, a college student also can have enough money for train tickets for daily activities such as work or hang out with friends. By contrast these advantages, I think that the cost for developing railways is very high and this amount of money could be used in more effective way.
While I support the convenience of train, I still believe that the governments should use money for roads. Most people now still choose personal vehicles such as cars or motorbikes as the main transportation every day. For instance, in most developing countries, there are millions of motorbike are used every day. Additionally, the carbon emissions also could be decreased significantly by the development of roads. In fact, thanks to new flat roads have been built in recent years, vehicles reduce substantially the using time so that the pollution is greatly reduced. Therefore, upgrading roads will bring bigger impacts on people than railways.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that railways have an important role in our life but I believe that improving roads could make more profits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proving roads could make more profits.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97682119205 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6892249101 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549668874172 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5560796587 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.2 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157762492529 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636242576522 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838816190472 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134828629055 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116408773186 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.