The bar chart compares the percentages in terms of the number of international students from four countries between 2004 to 2008.
It’s clear that the number of Chinese students were generally decreasing over four-year period, while America saw an increasingly growth from 2004 to 2008. Students coming from Japan were the number three popular international students in Europe, and Russia’s future remained at the lowest level during the whole time.
In 2004, there were around 27,500 students from China to European universities, however the number fell by approximately 12,5000 people by 2008. American students took over China and became the major group since 2006, nearly 18,000 students in these two countries respectively. Applicants from U.S.A reached to a peak at 27,500 in 2008, the same as the figure seen in China in the year 2004.
People from Japan, as the third largest group, were merely as much as the number of American’s in 2004, with about 6,000, and slightly increased to 10,000 in the year 2008. The figures of Russia remained the same level at average 2,500 at all times, contributing the least proportion overall.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('increasingly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...ver four-year period, while America saw an increasingly growth from 2004 to 2008. Students coming from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...tries respectively. Applicants from U.S.A reached to a peak at 27,500 in 2008, th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28648648649 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7438170083 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589189189189 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8342477544 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.25 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408864167105 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195453121739 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130758271257 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288464688371 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131778341245 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.