The pie charts compare the proportion of electricity generation in terms of five types of fuel source in Australia and France in the year 1980 and 2000.
It is clear that coal was the major source of producing electricity in 1980 and 2000, nuclear powder increased sharply to a peak in 2000, becoming the most important energy source. The capacity of energy production in two countries both improved dramatically in the year 2000.
The total production of electricity in Australia saw an increase from 100 units to 170 units. The figure in France was 10 units lower than Australian's, while it doubled in 2000, up to 180 units. Half of the electricity was produced by coal in Australia in 1980, and the proportion increased to 130 units by 2000, contributing approximately three quarters of total amount. Coal and natural gas were share equally 50% of total amount in 1980, however, nuclear rose from 15 units to 126 units.
Hydro power became the second important source from 20 units to 36 units, and natural gas and oil were no longer being used much in Australia. Coal and oil were still being used at the same level, with 25 units in France in 2000.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone-damaging gases from 1980 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that only small differences between the richest and the poorest members. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- An increasing number of people are changing their careers What are the reasons Do you think it is positive or negative 91
- The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applyingfor universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ustralia and France in the year 1980 and 2000. It is clear that coal was the m...
^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n increase from 100 units to 170 units. The figure in France was 10 units lower tha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75742574257 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58573697092 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529702970297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6121365998 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267104275169 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122659018008 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729535361468 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181650378949 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784274505176 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.