The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

The chart compares the proportion of goods carried by four different means in the UK over the period of 28 years from 1974 to 2002.

It's clear that road had been the major mean of transporting the goods during this period shown. Pipeline provided the least contribution to the country's transport. Overall, all the numbers generally saw increases.

In 1974, road was the number one transport tool with the percentage of 70 million units, in the following 22 years, the given numbers fluctuated slightly, until the year of 1996, began to increase sharply and later slowly to nearly 100 million tonnes by 2002. Shipped by water, was also another less popular way of approximately 40 million tonnes in the year 1974. After a deep increase since the year of 1978, the data of water remained at the same level around 60 million units for around 16 years, then increased nearly 10 million units at the end of 2002.

As for rail, it was took over by water then be seen as the third place in year of 1978, at 40 million units, and after experiencing roughly drop till 1995, rail regained it's proportion back to around 40 million units. Pipeline was extremely new in 1974, while it rose from 4 million to 18 million merely in 6 years. After that, it only kept 3 million increase for the rest of the time.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...the end of 2002. As for rail, it was took over by water then be seen as the third...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, third, while, as for, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 937.175257732 114% => OK
No of words: 232.0 206.0 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62068965517 4.54256449028 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38249412175 2.54303337028 94% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 127.690721649 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 290.88556701 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.83505154639 272% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4652503145 44.8134815571 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 76.5299724578 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 16.8248392259 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 4.34317383033 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13842007503 0.216113520407 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652226267418 0.0766984524023 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714901244618 0.0603063233224 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115297567241 0.12726935374 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810590297317 0.0580467560999 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 8.37731958763 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 70.7449484536 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 8.71597938144 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 7.59969072165 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.