It’s true that the amount of people visiting public art sites or relics are more than the people from local areas. There could be several reasons why this is the case, and I believe that if some appropriate measures could be introduced, there would have been more local habitants get involved.
There are various reasons why local people choose to visit other scenic spots other than the ones from their hometowns. As for the administrations of museums or others historical reserves, their responsibilities are not only to display the array of valuable treasures, but also to make then to be well know by the public. People who living in the cities are the most like to visit those distinguished places, if enough relevant information given. It’s quite understandable that people are prone to travel to a variety of areas or nations, to gain fresh experience and broaden their eyesight. In addition, born and raised at the same place, there’s not much motivation to explore where people are already completely familiar with, at least most of them prefer to speculate like that.
In my view, comparing to attract tourists visiting local museum, it’s much easier to people live around. Firstly, the municipal governments should hold some public events to propel the continuing attention to local touring spots. It’s the best opportunity to propagate the local projects related to art, culture and history during the events like municipal anniversary celebration. Secondly, holding small-scale of activities within communities about local history could also encourage people to go to visit. Finally, teachers at schools or universities could arise the students’ interests by organising them to wander into the museums in person.
In conclusion, although to attract more people to participate in the local cultural or historical events is challenging, we could solve this public issue well through an all-round joint effort.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, as for, at least, in addition, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39087947883 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86128866179 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602605863192 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4687785538 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.307692308 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326935585193 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113407837127 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769657280935 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202609332831 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557886110225 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.