The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005

The line graph compares the numbers of committing crimes happened in the UK and Wales, in terms of three distinct types, namely car theft, house burgling and street robbery, from 1970 to 2005.

It is clear that stealing car was the most significant way out of three choices, all the time during the 35-year period, and the figure for car theft was the highest in 1995. While the numbers of street robbery had been the lowest.

In 1970, there were 400,000 people stole cars, which were doubled than the number of house burgling, at 200,000. The figures for car theft rise steadily from 1970 to 1990, by 600,000, and began to fall dramatically before peaking at 1.6 million cases in the year 1995. Compared with the fluctuate trend seen in car theft, the numbers of robbery happened in streets remained at 20,000 until 1990, while people committed this crime increase nearly ten folds, to 200,000 by 2000, and remained stable.

By 1980, a rising pattern can also be seen in the numbers of house burgling, from 200,000 to 600,000. The highest numbers of people burgling houses stood at 700,000 for 5 years, since 1990. There were only 500,000 cases of house burgling found in both areas by 2005.

Votes
Average: 7 (7 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... for car theft was the highest in 1995. While the numbers of street robbery had been ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n cases in the year 1995. Compared with the fluctuate trend seen in car theft, the numbers of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78846153846 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15262242022 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1780507444 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978758448359 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465863298709 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515338570944 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764084417533 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615364804704 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.