The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005.
The line graph illustrates the comparison of the three different categories of crime ( car theft, house burglary, and street robbery) in England and Wales, over a 35 year period, from 1970 to 2005.
Overall, it is apparent that the crime which is related to car theft was higher than the house burglary and the street robbery throughout the entire period given.
From 1970 to 1980, the figure for the car thefts and the house burglaries followed the similar pattern. The crime rate was 0.4 million for the car theft and 0.2 million for the house burglary, which increased to 0.8 and 0.6 million respectively. After that, the crime rate for the car theft rose gradually, and in 1995, it reached a high of 1.6 million, then there was a sharp decline observed, in 2005, it went down to 1 million. On the other hand, then the number of cases for house burglaries fluctuated over the next years, and it reached around 5 million.
On the contrary, there were a meager amount of offense ( about 0.01 million) rates observed form 1970 to 1990 in England and Wales, but after that, this crime increased slightly and went to 0.2 million in 2000, and remained stable by the end of the given period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the three different categories of crime car theft, house burglary, and street ro...
^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, there were a meager amount of offense about 0.01 million rates observed form 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67142857143 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31943870761 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7484907337 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.142857143 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152940111649 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832997755961 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835158635334 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115883259846 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931936653764 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.