Many things that used to be done in the home by hands, but nowadays an increasing number of them are done by using machines. Discuss the advantages or disadvantages of this development.
In this modern world we have invented different types of machines which not only reduce our workload but also make our life more easy and comfortable. Using machines in our daily work have both positive and negative impact.
One of the advantages of mechanical equipment which is used in our workplace save our valuable time. For instance, now, we can solve different critical calculations within a short time, in compared to the calculation which was done manually by hand. Thus, we do not have to wait for a long time to solve a single calculation. The machines also can do heavy lifting work which is too heavy or too delicate for human muscles. For example, a crane can lift tons of loads which a man never can. Without the aid of machinery, such jobs would not have been done.
On the other hand, the machine which is used in different job sector has also some drawbacks. One of the negative effects of the use of machinery is that it pollutes our environment. Most of the mechanical tools us fossil fuels which produce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. As a result, it causes air pollution. Due to this air pollution, humans are suffering from different diseases. Another disadvantage of the machines is that it increases unemployment rates. In different industries, a single machine can produce thousands of products at a faster rate than the human. To illustrate, while a man can only make few dozen pins in a day by himself, with the help of machinery he can make thousands. Therefore, it does not require lots of workers.
To sum up, the beneficial effect of the machine is undeniable in our lives. Although it has some drawback, we can minimize its negative consequences by taking effective awareness programs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8389261745 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74162511394 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4483914031 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.8947368421 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6842105263 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0877085553855 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305108296038 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035885091375 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047988868689 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287198615491 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.