The diagram below shows the percentage of share of total world production of wheat by Asia, Europe and other part of the world from the years 1840 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar diagram illustrates the proportion of total world's wheat production by Asia, Europe and the rest of the world, from 1840 to 2000.
Overall, it is apparent that at the beginning of the given period, while Asia and Europe produced a significant amount of wheat than the other part of the world, at the end of the period both country's wheat production was declined.
In 1840, Asia and Europe in total produced 90% of wheat, whereas the rest of the world produced only 10%. In Asia, the production of wheat reduced to 30% in 1880 and 40 years later it again decreased to 20%. On the other hand, in Europe, wheat production increased gradually, which was 45% in 1880, and again increased by 5% in 1920. A similar trend also observed by the rest of the world.
In 1960, while Europe with the rest of the world captured a total of 75% of the world's wheat production, Asia comprised only 25%. Finally, in 2000, Asia again gained the highest position by capturing 40% of the world's wheat production. On the contrary, Europe's wheat production declined to about 28%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ram illustrates the proportion of total worlds wheat production by Asia, Europe and th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...he world captured a total of 75% of the worlds wheat production, Asia comprised only 2...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ighest position by capturing 40% of the worlds wheat production. On the contrary, Euro...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, whereas, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67724867725 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45467293569 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0750442178 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377454123864 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176635612802 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09968825592 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273077971616 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927110746716 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.