Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Nowadays, a large number of visitors are visiting different hustle places due to adventure, thrilling and quest for knowledge. However, a journey at such places remains life risk and it also hampers the natural environment.
Many peoples are touring different places which are unknown or people usually don't go such type of places. This is because they wants more thrill and adventure during their journey. The main benefits of this journey are that they can observe the natural beauty of that place, and also gather more knowledge. For example, a place named, "Nafakhum" where visiting is very difficult for anyone, but some peoples are visiting there because of the natural scenario of that place. If also gives pleasure to their minds, which is the benefit to their health.
On the other hand, touring such places such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic, where enough facilities are not available is very dangerous for our life. For instacne, if we get any trouble then it is not easy to communicate with others and we also can not call for help easily. Because in such places communication, like transportation or cell phone network is not available. Thus, visiting such places is risky for life.
To sum up, the nature of the human being is to conquer the unknown thing or place. So, they want to know everything to acquire and enrich their knowledge. Although visiting such places where weather condition and environment are difficult and risky but due to the quest of adventure they tour there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
Nowadays, a large number of visitors are visiting different hustle ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ces which are unknown or people usually dont go such type of places. This is because...
^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'want'
Suggestion: want
...ch type of places. This is because they wants more thrill and adventure during their ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66460695043 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3977400409 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7142857143 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379148058764 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134303878903 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946213077937 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231804246494 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453393012369 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.