Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Government always spend their money for the welfare of people. Although some people believe that the investment in some sectors, like cultural sector, is a waste of money. On the contrary, others think that government should spend their capital on public sectors. In my opinion, I believe that government should money on some important sectors, such as education, health and communication.
The most important sector where government should invest is the education. As we know that education is the backbone of a nation, so they should spend more money on this sector for its improvement. Government can provide more facilities to the students by giving them scholarship. For this reason, it will encourage them to take the higher education, as a result, the rate of educated people will increase. Thus, the increase number of educated people will lead to the development of the country.
Health sector is the another area where government should spend their capital. For example, in my country the modern hospital facilities in rural area are inadequate. Besides this, the number of patients are much higher in compared to the number of the hospitals. This facilities are a crucial need for the people of that area. So, government must spend their money on this sector instead of other unimportant sectors.
Government can also invest their money for the improvement of communication sectors, like bus and train. For instance, in my country the number of passengers in capital city is increasing day by day, but the vehicles which is provided for the passengers are not sufficient. So, people are facing many difficulties during their journey. Therefore, government can spend in this sector rather than other nonessential sectors.
To sum up, for the development of a country, government have to spend a lot of money on different sectors. This money comes for the taxes and VAT of its own people. So, I believe that these valuable money should be spent on essential public sectors rather than nonessential one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ompared to the number of the hospitals. This facilities are a crucial need for the p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15197568389 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7799140188 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45896656535 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1724613368 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.7142857143 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249850385422 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907630594243 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638100683725 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163750242442 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310024752916 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.