The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts compare the average proportion in terms of three different nutrients, namely Sodium, saturated fat and added sugar, contained in four types of meals eaten in the USA.

It is clear that similar proportion patterns can be seen from sodium and saturated fat segments. The highest number is sodium from dinner, while the percentage of sodium seen in breakfast is the lowest.

Looking at the figures closely, American’s dinner is consisted with 43% of sodium, 37% of saturated fat and 23% of added sugar, and the first two figures are the biggest numbers for each ingredient respectively. While the most significant part in snacks is added sugar, at 42%, the figures for the other two ingredients are much lower, with 21% saturated fat and 14% sodium.

American people consume less percentage for each nutrition for lunch and breakfast. The percentages of breakfast for three nutrition have no big difference, same for sugar and fat at 16% and less sodium at 14%. The percentage of sodium in lunch is doubled compared with the figure for breakfast, at 29%, and the figure for fat coming as the second important nutrient is 26%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...odium seen in breakfast is the lowest. Looking at the figures closely, American...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01041666667 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67827875385 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536458333333 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3849052091 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0736831927217 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420630622211 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498511563892 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636647773256 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626950056807 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.