The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.
The provided bar chart gives information about count of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected nations.
Overall, it is clear that greatest number of mobile phones observed in Germany, UK, Sweden and Italy while, people from Canada, US and Denmark used landlines.
As is observed from the chart that UK, Sweden and Italy accounted for highest count of mobile phone users (around 85 to 90). Landline users in Italy were almost half than the user of mobiles. Moreover, the number of landlines in the Sweden and UK was 68 and 58 respectively. In contrast, the least number of mobiles were used by Canadian, with amount of near 38 phones while, landlines were almost doubled in counting.
With regards to Denmark, a very little difference was recorded in between the number of landlines and mobile phones, the respective number was 88 and 82. However, with the difference of 10, mobile phones were ahead to the landlines in the Germany.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9751552795 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47596369195 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7883626505 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388038442645 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173810635638 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113812125188 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257111077122 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117603005337 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.