The bar chart demonstrates the number of mobile phones and landlines used by people in various seven countries. The scale is in phones and landlines per 100 people.
Overall, it can be manifested that the people of Denmark preferred landline most among the other countries while Italian preferred mobiles. Whereas, mobile least favorable by Canada.
To commence with, 90% of people preferred landlines where around 82% of people use the mobile phone in Denmark. In Canada, nearly 60% of people used landlines where almost half of the people used mobile phones. Moreover, in The USA approximately 70% of people chosen landlines and about half of people used mobile phones.
On the other hand, In Italy, mobile phones were famous for about 90%. Followed by 40% of Italian use landlines. Similarly, Swedish was convenient with a mobile phone roughly 88% and around 70% used a landline. In the UK, about 85% of pupils fine with mobile phones. Whereas, about 60% of British happy with landlines. Germen, who were preferred mobile and landline were under 70%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ferred mobile and landline were under 70
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88505747126 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43004925554 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477011494253 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 174.0 22.4926829268 774% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 850.0 112.824112599 753% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 174.0 22.9334400587 759% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 58.0 5.23603664747 1108% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247393944535 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.247393944535 0.103423049105 239% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189461977776 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785482319878 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 88.6 13.2329268293 670% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -105.13 61.2550243902 -172% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 71.2 10.3012195122 691% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.27 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.08 8.06136585366 187% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 71.6 10.9970731707 651% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 72.0 11.0658536585 651% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.