The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010

Essay topics:

The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010

The bar chart provides information about how many proportions took both genders in six various educational systems of the UK in 2010.

In general, the percentages of women teaching younger children were significantly higher in three types , while men teachers' degree were equal or greater in the other three system.

Looking at the details, it can be seen that the percentage of female teachers was the highest in Pre-school, at around 97 per cent. In both Nursery and Primary systems, male teachers were nowhere near as many as female ones. Male teachers of Secondary school were slight less than that female ones, at around 43 percent and about 46 percent respectively.

Looking more closely at the chart, we can see that the figures for men and women who worked as a teacher at a college were the same, experienced about 45 per cent. In University education, there were the highest number of male teachers, showing over 60. Female teachers were less than that male ones by around four percent at Private training institutes

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...were significantly higher in three types , while men teachers degree were equal or...
^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ones, at around 43 percent and about 46 percent respectively. Looking more clo...
^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...highest number of male teachers, showing over 60. Female teachers were less than ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96531791908 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58388145771 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7072874087 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268019510037 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115628288737 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402519785398 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15191572179 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408696487932 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.