The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of
educational setting in the UK in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main
features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart gives a distribution of teachers by gender in a range of educational institutions.
It is obvious to see that the teachers in nursery and primary school tend to be female despite the reality of high equality demonstrated by British GINI coefficient. The more the Gini coefficient close to 1, the less inequality that country achieve. Therefore, the significant gap between female teachers and male teachers suggest ax extreme variance for any further calculation.
Moving up to Secondary school, College and Private training institute, the proportion of gender variation is now much closer and less significant. The overall percentage varies between 40% and 60% of female and male teachers/lecturers respectively. Despite, this result conclude from a range of different schools and colleges, the reliability is questionable due to the unclear number of sample. Hence, it is hard to generalise to the whole population. Moreover, the contradictory between the collected data in key stage 1 compares to it is in Key stage 3, the distribution is now more equal equivalently with greater male employees distributed in higher education. This illustrated a gender reference in the educational system.
Lastly, in University, there is a wider gap between man and woman, nominated around 70% and 30% respectively. 40% gap suggest there is more favourable gender which is male.
- the internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created problems that did not exist before.What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solution can you suggest? 56
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types ofeducational setting in the UK in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- A post on Facebook asking for an arrangement 22
- the diagrams below show existing and proposed floor plan for the redevelopment of an art gallery. 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, lastly, moreover, second, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43055555556 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28161720625 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5401989699 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115302901216 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041153170922 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487358748167 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701930191455 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287517858589 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.