The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010.

The bar chart compares the percentage of both sexes who suffered from overweight in Australia between 1980 and 2010. Overall, what stands out from the chart is that the obesity level was the lowest for both sexes in 1980 and 2000 is a year in which many people witnessed overweight.
Looking at the details, in 1980, 40% of males were overweight while females were only 30%. 1980 was the lowest in the list for the percentage of overweight in both sexes. If we look at 1990, the figure was close for both men and women with around 48% and 45% respectively. 2000 was considered as a problematic year for males and females because of high obesity. The percentage of overweight males was 15% higher than the percentage of females, at 65% and 50% respectively. The number of women who were overweight remained stable at 50% although obesity in males was 60% in 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 711.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64705882353 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57375297296 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522875816993 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8180881617 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.875 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424498589365 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196454848645 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126281921538 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329057931418 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223503116821 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.