The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010

Essay topics:

The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010.

The bar chart provides information about the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia between 1980 to 2010.

Overall, it is clear to show that the proportion of overweight males are higher than females, while the figure shows that both genders experienced an upward trend over the periods.

In 1980, 40% of Australian men were over heavy and it rose slightly to about 50% in 1990. Even though the figures swelled sharply in 2000 of about 65%, it went down modestly to over 60% at the end of the period.

In contrast, the percentage of women, who were overweight, were lower than males. However, there was a steep rise in the proportion of overweight females from just 30% at the beginning of the period to approximately 45% in 1990. In 2000, this number was a significant increase to 50% and then stayed at the same level in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (23 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, well, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 713.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72185430464 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58201720736 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609271523179 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5256570625 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.857142857 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429559450109 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182023485847 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188725474492 0.0843802449381 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260775053174 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20734476277 0.0819641961636 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.