The chart shows the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in different years.
The pie charts provide the percentage of holidaymakers from one particular area who used 4 different types of accommodation during the period of 40 years, beginning in 1965.
In overall, it is clear that while private house was the most popular type of recreational housing in 1965, hotel dominated the highest percentage in 2005. Moreover, while caravans and hotels experienced a remarkable growth during the whole period, the opposite trend was witnessed in the remaining types of facilities.
According to the chart, 55% of travellers chose friends’ houses as their holiday accommodation in 1965, dominating the first place in the ranking. However, the next 40-year-period experienced a significant decline by 25% in this section, accounting for only 30% in the final year. In contrast, starting with only 16% in the initial year, the figure for hotel then increased to a highest number at the end of the period, at 37% in 1985 and 38% in 2005.
The trend was totally different when it came to the other types of accommodation. While the percentage of visitors staying in caravans saw a significant increase by 20% during the whole 40 years, camping accounted for only 12% in the end after witnessing a slight decline by 3%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... the figure for hotel then increased to a highest number at the end of the period...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, then, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0637254902 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97617655294 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1089454047 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.125 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198375213135 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876062475748 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826147199426 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13024901217 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886429295224 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.