The pie and bar charts below represent the data regarding the pernicious plant species as well as their dangerous signs all over the world. Overall, it is clearly seen that there is a least percentage of critically endangered plant species whereas the tropical wet forest is more afflicted with this tribulation. Generally, the endangered species are slightly higher such as 3.00 percentage as compared to the critically endangered species. Moreover, the second least percentage of inaccurate information which is 4.62 percentage conduct by researchers. However, the mostly area is protected from these pernicious snags which is 64.10 percentage. Adventing further, it is palpable from the bar graph that the higher dangerous proportion is arised such as 63.0 percentage all over the tropical wet forest while the desert has a least risk as compared to all the sectors such as 0.5 percentage. As long as, there is only a little distinct means 0.2 percentage between the wetlands and tropical dry grassland.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir dangerous signs all over the world. Overall, it is clearly seen that there ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Overall, it is clearly seen that there is a least...
^^
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...rall, it is clearly seen that there is a least percentage of critically endange...
^
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is clearly seen that there is a least percentage of critically endangered pla...
^^
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast percentage of critically endangered plant species whereas the tropical wet f...
^^
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s more afflicted with this tribulation. Generally, the endangered species are s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tribulation. Generally, the endangered species are slightly high...
^^
Line 1, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...critically endangered species. Moreover, the second least percentage of inaccurat...
^^
Line 1, column 653, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...centage conduct by researchers. However, the mostly area is protected from these ...
^^
Line 1, column 739, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icious snags which is 64.10 percentage. Adventing further, it is palpable from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 813, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Adventing further, it is palpable from the bar graph that t...
^^
Line 1, column 974, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ropical wet forest while the desert has a least risk as compared to all the sect...
^
Line 1, column 1001, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e desert has a least risk as compared to all the sectors such as 0.5 percentage. ...
^^
Line 1, column 1055, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ors such as 0.5 percentage. As long as, there is only a little distinct means 0....
^^
Line 1, column 1089, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'mean'?
Suggestion: mean
...ng as, there is only a little distinct means 0.2 percentage between the wetlands and...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, regarding, second, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29375 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86704742505 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2743012716 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133610327909 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618593262294 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067627884805 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133610327909 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.