The given bar chart represents various ways related to waste disposal system in respective four countries associates with Toronto , Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. The whole information is evaluated and discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
Firstly, In the Toronto and Madrid named countries, Landfill is pretty famous in former one as compared to Incineration other method in later country. The highest proportion is 75% and lowest proportion is approximately 5% in the two methods are Landfill and Composting in the Toronto. On the other side, Madrid has 40 % interest in Incineration method.
Secondly, the other two countries, Kuala Lumpur and Amman just have a 55% share of total effort in Incineration and 49% interest in Landfill. Both , making less efforts in Composting method that's cover proportion in between 2 % to 9% class interval.
In the conclusion, it seems to me that the Landfill and Incineration are mostly wanted method to use in the above - mentioned following countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given bar chart represents various ways related to waste disposal s...
^^
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...waste disposal system in respective four countries associates with Toronto , Madr...
^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... four countries associates with Toronto , Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. The wh...
^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the upcoming paragraphs. Firstly, In the Toronto and Madrid named countrie...
^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the Toronto and Madrid named countries, Landfill is pretty famous in former one ...
^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untry. The highest proportion is 75% and lowest proportion is approximately 5% in...
^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sting in the Toronto. On the other side, Madrid has 40 % interest in Incineration...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Madrid has 40 % interest in Incineration method. Secondly, the other two cou...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t in Incineration method. Secondly, the other two countries, Kuala Lumpur a...
^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Secondly, the other two countries, Kuala Lumpur and Amman just have a 55% ...
^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e other two countries, Kuala Lumpur and Amman just have a 55% share of total eff...
^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hare of total effort in Incineration and 49% interest in Landfill. Both , making...
^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion and 49% interest in Landfill. Both , making less efforts in Composting metho...
^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...9% interest in Landfill. Both , making less efforts in Composting method thats cove...
^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...aking less efforts in Composting method thats cover proportion in between 2 % to 9% c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% class interval. In the conclusion, it seems to me that the Landfill and In...
^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, it seems to me that the Landfill and Incineration are mostly wanted method t...
^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o me that the Landfill and Incineration are mostly wanted method to use in the a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36305732484 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9892098797 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0713864555 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 1.69756097561 1060% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289780040624 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111197896809 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119437999471 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15885636759 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11569687383 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.